Welcome back to the ‘A Little Wiser’ community! Thank you for sharing and supporting our work it’s what allows us to keep exploring the most fascinating corners of the world. (And by the way, we're confident your cumulative knowledge from reading each edition this year will make you the undisputed champion of this Christmas’ trivia.) Grab your coffee and let’s dive into today’s knowledge.

In 1987, a young Japanese scientist named Yoshizumi Ishino peered into the genetic blueprint of E. coli and discovered something that would reshape modern medicine. There, embedded in the bacterium's DNA like a message written in code, were identical sequences repeating at perfect intervals. This pattern was so deliberate it seemed to mock the chaotic randomness of evolution. Ishino documented his findings, published them in an obscure journal, and moved on unaware of its significance. What Ishino had discovered was a living archive where bacteria catalog every virus that's ever tried to kill them. Each repeated sequence was a fragment of enemy DNA, preserved like battlefield trophies in an invisible museum. For nearly two decades, this discovery languished in scientific obscurity, a curiosity without context.

The crucial leap occurred when Spanish scientist Francisco Mojica, working independently to understand how bacteria fight viruses, used computer-driven sequence analysis in the early 2000s and found that the repeating patterns of Ishino's exact discovery were ubiquitous in bacterial defense systems. The repeating pattern, later christened CRISPR, turned out to be a microbial immune system so sophisticated it seemed almost conscious. Here's how it works: when a virus invades, the bacterium snips off a piece of the attacker's DNA and stores it in its CRISPR archive. If that virus dares return, the bacterium recognizes it instantly and unleashes Cas9, a guided protein that hunts down the matching genetic sequence and cuts it to pieces before the virus can reproduce. What looked like evolutionary junk turned out to be a programmable defense system more adaptive than anything human engineers had ever conceived.

Then a breakthrough occurred. Scientists realized they could hijack the system entirely. Instead of using the viral "mugshots" bacteria had collected, they wrote their own guide RNA: the molecular address that tells Cas9 where to cut. Overnight, the machinery bacteria used for survival became a precision tool for editing DNA in anything from plants to animals and humans. By 2023, this ancient microbial trick had produced the first FDA approved CRISPR therapy for sickle cell disease, a one time cure built on technology perfected in our own evolution. A footnote from 1987 had become the foundation of modern medicine, proof that evolution buries its best ideas in the smallest, most overlooked corners of life.

Below - Temporal trends of publications that have CRISPR in the title. The clinical landscape for CRISPR-Cas systems has rapidly expanded.

The most dramatic shift in modern warfare began with objects so small and strange that generals once dismissed them as toys. In 1849, Austria launched pilotless hot air balloons packed with explosives toward Venice in one of the first attempts at remote warfare. A century later, the British Royal Navy trained with radio-controlled aircraft called Queen Bees. Today, those early experiments have evolved into a technology that defines twenty-first century battlefields. Nowhere is this more evident than in Ukraine, where both Russian and Ukrainian forces use drones for surveillance, targeting, and attack. The front line has become a place where everything can be seen and almost nothing can hide. Drones are now estimated to be responsible for around 70-80% of Russian casualties and are credited with the destruction of nearly 85% of enemy military targets on the front line.

The rise of drones is driven by simple economics. During the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Israel used unarmed drones to bait Egypt into wasting expensive anti-aircraft missiles. That same strategy now dominates Ukraine, where a commercial drone costing a few hundred dollars can destroy armor worth millions. The asymmetry is stark: trading a $2 million interceptor missile for a $20,000 Shahed drone is a massive financial drain that threatens defensive solvency. Ukrainian units have used first-person view racing drones to hit Russian tanks at low altitude while Russia has deployed long-endurance systems to track and strike targets deep behind the frontline, some using fiber-optic cables instead of radio signals to evade electronic jamming. High-endurance drones like the MQ-9 Reaper can stay airborne for up to forty hours because they don't carry a pilot. When a crew becomes tired, they simply hand over controls from a base thousands of miles away. Militaries are also experimenting with drone swarms, releasing dozens or even hundreds of coordinated machines to overwhelm air defenses designed for larger and fewer threats. The global military drone market reflects this shift: estimated at over $40 billion in 2024, it's projected to nearly double to over $87 billion by 2030. Defense tech startups like Anduril Industries have seen their valuations soar, doubling to $30 billion by June 2025 as investors recognize the future of warfare.

Drones have shown how small forces can outmaneuver powerful states with a handful of cheap devices. Ukraine, despite losing its conventional navy in 2022, has used low-cost kamikaze surface and underwater drones to successfully push the Russian navy out of the western Black Sea. Artillery units on both sides now fire within minutes because a drone has already spotted a target from above. What once took half an hour has been slashed to a matter of seconds. Borders no longer feel like barriers when machines cross them quietly, and traditional defenses look outdated when confronted by waves of small, expendable aircraft. The way a war is waged has fundamentally changed.

One of the most disturbing insights into human behavior began with a story that shocked New York in 1964. A young woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked outside her apartment in Queens, and early reports claimed that thirty-eight neighbors saw or heard the assault and did nothing. The details were later shown to be heavily exaggerated, but the emotional power of the story was undeniable. Americans confronted a terrifying paradox. Why would a crowd of ordinary people fail to act in an emergency when any one of them might have intervened if they had been alone? The idea gripped two young psychologists, Bibb Latané and John Darley, who suspected the explanation had nothing to do with cruelty and everything to do with how groups reshape our instincts.

Their experiments revealed a pattern that seemed to defy common sense - the more people who witness an emergency, the less likely anyone is to help. Latané and Darley demonstrated this in controlled studies where volunteers sat in a room as smoke drifted under the door. Those alone reported it almost immediately while those in groups stayed still, watching one another and assuming everything was fine. The psychologists identified two forces at work. Diffusion of responsibility made individuals think someone else would act. Pluralistic ignorance made them misread the silence of the group as a sign that there was no real danger. They even mapped the process into a five-step decision tree. You must notice the event, interpret it as an emergency, accept responsibility, know what to do, and act. Failure at any step leads to paralysis. Many participants later admitted they worried about embarrassment, a barrier the researchers called evaluation apprehension. The result was a dangerous illusion where each person waited for a signal that never came.

What makes the Bystander Effect so unsettling is that it still plays out every day in crowds, workplaces, classrooms, and online spaces. But the research also points to a simple way to defeat it. When one person takes action, others follow and when the victim identifies a specific helper with a clear instruction, the paralysis breaks instantly. Instead of shouting "someone call for help," you shout "you in the blue shirt, call for help." Responsibility moves from everywhere to somewhere. The lesson psychologists drew from Genovese was stark but hopeful. People don't remain passive because they don't care. They remain passive because they think someone else will step forward first. The moment one person moves, the entire group changes.

If you found that cartoon amusing forward this email to one person so they can subscribe below (or 20 if really you love our newsletter).

We hope you enjoyed today’s edition. Thank you to everyone reading, sharing, and helping A Little Wiser reach new people every week. We value every reader so please reply and tell us a lesson you’d love to see soon!

Until next time…. - A Little Wiser Team

🕮 Three lessons. Three times a week. Three minutes at a time.
💌 Enjoyed this edition? Share it with someone curious.