Welcome back to 'A Little Wiser.' We appreciate the overwhelming support this past week, especially the social media shares that made our last edition the most read post of the year! Today’s wisdom explores:
The Economics of a Formula 1 team
How Backgammon Spread Through Empires
Hercules’ Twelve Labors
Settle in, grab your coffee, and let’s explore today’s knowledge.
FINANCE
🏎️ The Economics of a Formula 1 Team
Formula One looks like a blur of speed, glamour, and celebrity paddocks but behind every champagne spray is a balance sheet stretched tighter than a Red Bull rear wing. To secure a spot on the Formula 1 grid, a prospective entrant must pay a $358 million anti-dilution fee to the incumbent teams. This isn't a government permit or a license to race, it's protection money paid to the established order, and Cadillac is paying it to join in 2026. Only then can a new team begin spending on what actually matters. The 2024 cost cap sits at $135 million base. That sounds restrictive until you realize what it excludes: driver salaries (Max Verstappen alone earns $75 million), marketing budgets, engine development, and capital expenditures on facilities. What makes Formula 1 so paradoxical is that spending more doesn't guarantee winning. The cost cap was meant to level the field, yet Red Bull dominated 2021–2023 not through outspending rivals but through superior technical insight. Meanwhile, teams like Haas operate near the spending minimum, effectively renting technology from Ferrari and accepting mid-pack finishes as their business model.
The car itself is a masterpiece of engineering economics. A complete F1 car costs up to $20 million to build. Each wheel costs about $3,000 and teams go through hundreds of sets across a year while a gearbox lasts maybe six races and each unit costs upwards of $250,000. Teams employ up to 1,000 people, most of them engineers and aerodynamicists working in factory complexes that rival small universities. Wind tunnels are the most expensive tools in the arsenal where teams test models to generate aerodynamic data: building one costs $100–200 million, running one demands multi-megawatt fan power, and hiring times at commercial facilities costs $35,000 per day. The FIA strictly rations wind tunnel usage, with last-place teams getting more hours than champions to balance development. Between races, engineers strip cars to bare chassis, analyze 300+ sensor channels, and rebuild with microscopic improvements. One major crash is enough to compromise an entire season under the cap and when Nico Rosberg crashed his Mercedes in Monaco qualifying in 2014, a mechanic told him the repair bill was roughly the price of a London flat.
Yet these costs are only half the equation. What keeps teams alive year after year is the revenue side of the balance sheet. Prize money flows from a $1.4 billion annual pot split among ten teams, with the champion collecting roughly $147 million and last place taking home $70 million. F1 teams are now one of the hottest assets in global sport. Liberty Media’s Netflix-era transformation has made the teams mini-media companies with guaranteed revenue where title sponsors on winning teams pay $50–80 million annually for branding rights. Teams sell everything from on-board cameras to data partnerships, trackside branding, and luxury hospitality. The average team earns £150–£300 million annually across these streams. The economics of F1 are brutally expensive, occasionally absurd, and always precarious, but when everything clicks, the returns are as explosive as a DRS overtake. It’s not just racing; it's capitalism soaring at 200 miles per hour.

The cost of an F1 car 2024
HISTORY
🎲 How Backgammon Spread Through Empires
Backgammon is one of the oldest continuously played games on Earth, older than chess, cards, or almost any strategy game we know today. Its origins trace back more than 5,000 years to ancient Mesopotamia, where archaeologists uncovered board fragments in the Royal Tombs of Ur. But the game we recognize of two players racing pieces around a board while attacking and defending with dice emerged in Persia. There it was called nard, and it quickly became a favourite pastime of nobles and soldiers alike. Legend tells of a Persian king who presented backgammon to the Indian court as an intellectual challenge. The Indian response was swift and striking: the gift of chess. The implied message, captured by chroniclers, was profound: "Here is a game of chance, and here is a game of pure skill. Master both, and you will understand life itself."
As empires expanded, backgammon travelled with them. The Romans adopted it enthusiastically, renaming it tabula and gambling fortunes on it in taverns and military camps. Emperor Claudius reportedly had a board fitted into his travelling carriage so he could play on the move. Centuries later, Arab traders carried the game westward across North Africa and into Spain where it folded seamlessly into medieval European culture. The rules evolved each time an empire rose or fell: the Byzantines added doubling, the Normans spread it across England, and the Ottoman Empire cemented its popularity from Cairo to Istanbul. For armies marching across continents and merchants riding caravan routes, backgammon was a compact form of entertainment that didn’t need a shared language but dice, strategy, and a willingness to take risks.
By the 17th century, the game was so widespread that England gave it its modern name of back-gammon, meaning “back game,” a nod to the rule that allows pieces to re-enter the board after being hit. Its global spread is a living map of human interaction: trade, war, migration, and cultural blending. Today it remains one of the few games equally at home in London pubs, Lebanese cafés, and Central Asian tea houses. What kept it alive wasn’t just the strategy or the luck, but the way it captured life’s constant tension between planning and chance. Empires vanished, borders changed, languages evolved and yet the rhythmic clatter of dice on wood carried on.

Painting in tomb of Egyptian queen Nefertari, showing a board of Senet an early variation of backgammon
MYTHS
🦁 Hercules’ Twelve Labors
Before he became the most recognisable hero of the ancient world, Hercules (or Herakles in Greek) was a prince of Tiryns born into catastrophe. As the son of Zeus and the mortal Alcmene, he entered the world under Hera’s vengeful gaze. She was a goddess who despised him as proof of Zeus’s infidelity and hunted him from infancy. She sent serpents to kill him in his cradle (he strangled them), cursed him through his adolescence, and ultimately drove him into a temporary madness as an adult that led him to kill his own wife and children. Overwhelmed by guilt and seeking purification, Hercules consulted the Oracle at Delphi. The Oracle, speaking for Apollo, handed down his sentence: he was to serve King Eurystheus, his cowardly cousin, and complete whatever “impossible” tasks the king devised.
The King arranged the varied and strangely practical twelve labors. They ranged from feats of brute strength (strangling the invulnerable Nemean Lion) to tasks that required almost bureaucratic creativity, like capturing the Ceryneian Hind without spilling its sacred blood. The Hydra (a monstrous serpent with multiple heads, when one was cut off, two more grew back in its place) forced him into tactical innovation. Hercules used Iolaus (his squire) to cauterise each neck - teamwork so controversial that Eurystheus disqualified the labor and added another in retaliation. The Augean Stables, stuffed with decades of immortal cattle waste, turned Hercules into an accidental civil engineer when he calmly diverted two rivers to wash them clean. Other tasks verged on diplomacy and theft: talking down the Amazons before things inevitably turned violent, or sneaking the golden apples from the Hesperides with the help of Atlas himself. By the time he fetched Cerberus (the gigantic three-headed dog who prevented the dead from escaping the Underworld) Hercules had reinvented what “heroism” meant. His final task was completed unarmed using endurance, intellect and a flexible interpretation of divine instructions.
Across Greece, then Rome, and eventually the medieval world, these stories spread as coded lessons about human struggle. The Labors symbolised debts that can’t be ignored, guilt that demands action, and the uncomfortable truth that redemption usually involves tasks we’d much rather avoid. Ancient commentators noted that each labor mirrors a real human challenge: confronting something invulnerable, cleaning up someone else’s disaster, resisting temptations, negotiating with hostile powers, or carrying burdens that don’t belong to us. Hercules became a model because he kept going, even when the gods stacked the game against him. His Labors endure not as fantasy, but as an ancient guidebook on how to tackle the impossible.

Hercules straining under the weight of the cosmos so Atlas can retrieve the Golden Apples
We hope you enjoyed today’s edition. Thank you to everyone reading, sharing, and helping A Little Wiser reach new people every week. We value every reader so please reply and tell us a lesson you’d love to see soon!
Until next time…. - A Little Wiser Team
🕮 Three lessons. Three times a week. Three minutes at a time.
💌 Enjoyed this edition? Share it with someone curious.
